Insurers Vs. Providers: Will Consumers Win?

The real battle for health care reform has begun.


As Barack Obama heads to New Hampshire to stump for health reform, his administration has been taking a hard line on health insurers. However, Business Week has declared that the insurance companies have already won the war. Business Week notes that more Americans covered (and skimpier coverage) is helpful for insurance company bottom lines – and points to a multimillion dollar investment by United HealthCare to provide data and talking points for conservative Democrats, who hold the key to the evolving health care reform bill.


Meanwhile, America’s Health Insurance Plans has just released very telling data about provider prices that should make physicians and hospitals blush. As Gina Kolata recounts in tomorrow morning’s New York Times some procedures are charged at over ten times what Medicare allows. This is the ugly other side to Andrew Cuomo’s prosecution of Ingenix, a United HealthCare subsidiary, for calculating inappropriately low “usual and customary” fees. Some of the existing fees are utterly ridiculous. (For instance, in Massachusetts, a provider billed an insurer $10,000 for minimally invasive knee surgery for which Medicare pays under $700!). Of course, there is plenty of blame to go around – insurers pay the lesser of “allowed” and “billed charges,” encouraging providers to bill high amounts so that they leave no money on the table.


The more the public learns about the seemy underbelly of medical billing and reimbursement, the more support will grow for government intervention. Past efforts to regulate prices were largely regarded as failures – although interestingly recent reports of costs of bariatric (obesity) surgery pointed out that Maryland, the only state with remaining hospital price regulation, had the lowest prices for this procedure.


By the way – great 2006 article by Uwe Reinhardt entitled The Pricing Of U.S. Hospital Services: Chaos Behind A Veil Of Secrecy helps explain this crazy-quilt irrational system we’ve got.


We're Not the Only Ones with a Health Care Inflation Problem

The Wall Street Journal had a thoughtful piece on Friday about how France is having trouble coping with runaway medical inflation. Maternity wards are closing, and copayments are going up to try to tamp down demand. Patients are aghast at $2/hour parking at some health care facilities. It seems a different world than when Michael Moore filmed Sicko. The journal shows cumulative health care inflation in the UK, US, France and Japan since 1992.

A better way to look at this would be showing cumulative health care costs over some recent period. I've taken OECD data (as reported June, 2009, using purchasing power parity and adjusting all costs to 2000 dollar values to account for inflation and relative wealth of countries. I have used excel to autofill 2008 results for some countries based on 2000-7 data). You can see that this shows that health care inflation is pretty much a problem everywhere - and the slopes are pretty consistent. There are a few countries with much higher health care inflation than the US (Slovakia, Korea, Greece) - these have generally had high growth rates.


The most striking thing the first chart shows is that the US starts at such a high cost that even if our inflation rate is not the highest in the world, the absolute impact on our economy is substantially greater than in other OECD countries. (Note that from 2000-2007, health care inflation in France has been substantially lower than in the US).


Double click on the charts below to enlarge.



Controlling Costs: No Easy Answers

Dan Callahan has a good perpective piece at the New England Journal web site pointing out how difficult it will be to control costs in health care. Two quotes worth pulling out:


“Cost controls that are likely to be politically acceptable will not be very effective, and what might be effective will not be acceptable."


“Achieving [decreased growth of costs in health care] will require nothing less than changes in medical and professional values, patients’ demands and expectations, industry profit seeking, research aims and aspirations, and the culture of American medicine.”


Callahan goes back to the December, 2008 Congressional Budget Office menu of 115 ideas to lower health care costs. Callahan highlights the (painful) fee reductions that look most promising in that document. Bundling payments (or even capitation) also figures in the CBO options – and might be more promising. Massachusetts’ health care payment reform commission recently proposed a transition away from fee-for-service payment. More on this in the next post.